Lube company merger receiving second 'in-depth' probe

This is a good place to drop general and weird news, entertainment, and general show prep material that might be interesting to air talent or producers. Hot dog threads ALWAYS welcome.

Moderators: The People's DJ, David Paleg

Post Reply
User avatar
cgarison
Member
Member
Posts: 2032
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 11:28 pm
Location: The Encampment

Lube company merger receiving second 'in-depth' probe

Post by cgarison »

Sometimes the Brits just do it better.....

Lube company merger receiving second 'in-depth' probe
Durex, KY union leaving smaller players without any action - CMA

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/01/08 ... pth_probe/

Frustrated after its initial probe into a merger between two lube companies, the UK's Competition Markets Authority wants to push deeper into the decision of the makers of Durex and K-Y to jump into bed together.

The two companies agreed to make the corporate entity with one back on 10 March 2014 after Durex maker Reckitt Benckiser (RB) confirmed the purchase of the K-Y brand from Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

But the CMA has found that, as a result of the transaction, the merged company would become the largest supplier of personal lubricants to grocery retailers and national pharmacy chains in the UK.

Such a move will mean other lube brands will fail to get any market action.

"The CMA has therefore decided to refer the merger for an in-depth phase 2 investigation," said the market regulator.

It follows a December recommendation from the CMA to refer the merger for a full investigation "unless the parties offered acceptable undertakings to address its concerns around the supply of personal lubricants".

Reckitt Benckiser offered undertakings intended to address the concerns identified but "after careful consideration the CMA was not confident that these would resolve the concerns in a clear-cut manner", it said.

Sheldon Mills, CMA director of mergers, said: "Durex and K-Y are two very well-known personal lubricant brands. While these personal lubricants are differentiated to an extent, we found that retailers and consumers perceive them as competitors and, in a significant number of instances, they are the only brands offered by grocery retailers or national pharmacy chains."

A decision on the merger will be made by a group of independent panel members supported by a case team of CMA staff. ®
The first step in a successful revolution is to defeat all competing revolutionaries.
User avatar
Arp2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2136
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:58 pm

Re: Lube company merger receiving second 'in-depth' probe

Post by Arp2 »

Honestly, based on the headlines, I was assuming this was about some strife between a couple ten-minute oil change places and a union in some town in Kentucky I'd never heard of.......
"I don't know the same things you don't know."

"Yes, you do; you just won't admit it!"


"Yeeee...it looks like a 'Belt Buckle & Ball Cap' convention in here......"
User avatar
cgarison
Member
Member
Posts: 2032
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 11:28 pm
Location: The Encampment

Re: Lube company merger receiving second 'in-depth' probe

Post by cgarison »

Yea, that headline through me through a loop when I read it on The Register.

:mrgreen:

Definitely worth sharing here.
The first step in a successful revolution is to defeat all competing revolutionaries.
Tom Taggart
Member
Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2001 11:30 am
Location: Marietta, Ohio

Re: Lube company merger receiving second 'in-depth' probe

Post by Tom Taggart »

Yes, appears the Register is a good place to find hard news.... :)
Post Reply