FCC DTV coverage maps

Computer, engineering, and other technical assistance.

Moderators: genlock, sportsvoice

Post Reply
Force Commander
Member
Member
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:19 am

FCC DTV coverage maps

Post by Force Commander »

Looking at the Charleston/Huntington maps, I have to highly suspect the program that generated this doesn't take in to account terrain.

http://www.fcc.gov/dtv/markets/
"We are the CC Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your broadcast stations. We will add your biological and creative distinctiveness to our own. Your broadcast personality will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile."
User avatar
Hoosier Daddy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2002 11:35 am
Location: Not 100% in love with your tone right now.

Re: FCC DTV coverage maps

Post by Hoosier Daddy »

Columbus Ohio has WSYX (Analog Channel 6) moving to Digital 13
WOWK in Huntington has chosen to abandon Digital 47 and go digital on 13.
Columbus map shows a band of lost WSYX viewers for Pike, Ross, Jackson, Vinton, Athens, Perry, Morgan and Hocking Counties.
Whose fucking brainchild was this one?

:roll:
Translators are a Pox on the FM radio dial.
User avatar
Hoosier Daddy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2002 11:35 am
Location: Not 100% in love with your tone right now.

Re: FCC DTV coverage maps

Post by Hoosier Daddy »

Biggest losers:

Check out the Bluefield-Beckley-Oak Hill map.

WOAY Channel 4
WVVA Channel 6

Ouch!

8O
Translators are a Pox on the FM radio dial.
User avatar
Dave Loudin
Member
Member
Posts: 600
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2001 7:48 am
Location: King George, VA

Re: FCC DTV coverage maps

Post by Dave Loudin »

Low-VHF to UHF conversions seem to be the worst off (see KCBS and WNBC). However, these maps were produced before maximization applications were filed, so things will be better next month (except for WSYX).
Aircheck? You'd make a great board op.
User avatar
cgarison
Member
Member
Posts: 2032
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 11:28 pm
Location: The Encampment

Re: FCC DTV coverage maps

Post by cgarison »

WLPX is quite accurate. No Signal in my part of Boyd County, KY.

WPBO disappeared from my dial after the DTV converter was installed at the Compound. THat should not have happened
WPBY also went away, but I see lost signal dots around the Compound. Being on top of the hill, I would not have expected the lost signal, but maybe something in the area is interefering with the signal.
The first step in a successful revolution is to defeat all competing revolutionaries.
User avatar
Dave Loudin
Member
Member
Posts: 600
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2001 7:48 am
Location: King George, VA

Re: FCC DTV coverage maps

Post by Dave Loudin »

You could run detailed propagation predictions at tvfool.com to see if there's terrain blockage.
Aircheck? You'd make a great board op.
djMatty
Member
Member
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 1:08 am
Location: Columbus Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: FCC DTV coverage maps

Post by djMatty »

Dave Loudin wrote:Low-VHF to UHF conversions seem to be the worst off (see KCBS and WNBC). However, these maps were produced before maximization applications were filed, so things will be better next month (except for WSYX).

WSYX eats it big time looking at the PDF for Columbus.

WTTE Fox 28 Columbus, WWHO 53 CW, and WSFJ 51 (TBN) stand to gain a lot though looking at the maps.
Matt
Program Director/Music Director/Owner
X music Online "The X"
Positive Rock Radio
http://www.xmusiconline.com/
AmpedNow
Member
Member
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 4:46 am
Location: none

Re: FCC DTV coverage maps

Post by AmpedNow »

It appears that many rimshotters made out great by now having the room to move directly into the market.

NYC and Houston gained several "new" DTV channels, among others.
User avatar
Hoosier Daddy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2002 11:35 am
Location: Not 100% in love with your tone right now.

Re: FCC DTV coverage maps

Post by Hoosier Daddy »

If we had a REAL FCC, this digital signal war between the 13s in southeast Ohio wouldn't be allowed to occur.

:evil:
Translators are a Pox on the FM radio dial.
User avatar
genlock
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5867
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 4:09 pm
Location: OW

Re: FCC DTV coverage maps

Post by genlock »

Realize that two DTV stations on the same channel can stand much more interference with each
other than analog stations in the same condition. You may be able to copy both stations with a rotatable antenna.
WSYX was the station with an antenna mechanically tilted for interference reduction to a station to the west.
In other words bolts loosened and washers inserted on the west side of the antenna. Apparently they should have
ordered a slightly directional antenna and didn't do it. Anyway don't sweat the DTV interference
till you actually see it. First adjacents do not appear to pose much of a problem.
Tower, rotator , hi-band yagi, lo-uhf yagi, hi-uhf yagi and you are set.
Add good coax and a proper coax switch.
"Everyone Should be aware that you're just a screen grab away from infamy."
User avatar
Hoosier Daddy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2002 11:35 am
Location: Not 100% in love with your tone right now.

Re: FCC DTV coverage maps

Post by Hoosier Daddy »

I'm on cable and get both stations now. Will cable be able to differentiate between 13 Columbus and 13 Huntington if the CATV head end is anywhere near the geographic midpoint?

It still seems the easiest solution is for the FCC to say "no way" and require one station to change frequency. After all, there are -- what -- sixty television frequencies out there?

:?
Translators are a Pox on the FM radio dial.
User avatar
genlock
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5867
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 4:09 pm
Location: OW

Re: FCC DTV coverage maps

Post by genlock »

Yes, a properly engineered antenna system could do just that.
You can depend on your cable system to do a good job.
"Everyone Should be aware that you're just a screen grab away from infamy."
Post Reply